|
|
||||||||||
|
05.12.2005 Partners:
|
http://www.performancebrush.com/en/chroniques.php?id=19Timing Rocks: Many methods... Which One to Choose?
|
|||||||||
Interval Timing or Timing From the Back Line to the First Hog LineI setted up that system of timing in 1992. The idea was to help the sweepers evaluate the speed of the rock to improve their weight jugement. That theory was one of the 12 tasks to obtain my level IV coaching certification. At that time we were using a countdown stopwatch setted at 3.5 seconds. The idea is to start the stopwatch when the rock reach the back line and listen the sound of the stopwatch when reaching zero. The location of the stone at the sound tells the sweepers where the rock is going to stop. After three weeks of training, we made a test to verify the effectiveness of the system. Our skip threw 10 draws ; the sweepers had to tell where they beleive the stone was to stop and they had to make their prediction when the rock was near the first hog line. We got exceptionnal result ; our sweepers never miss by more than one foot. Than, we knew we had put together a very succesfull system. Countdown stopwatches behing difficult to find, many teams used regular stopwatches and stopped it at the first hog line. The interval timing was born. Even though, at the beginning, the only goal of the interval timing was to help the sweepers juge the speed of the rocks, we soon found more advantages to that system. That method allowed us to find the speed of the rocks. If one or many rocks were different for draw weights, the interval timing was showing that difference. It also means that this system helps to match the rocks before or during a competition. I remember a very special situation. At the 1993 World Junior Championship in Grindlewald in Switzerland, we had to play with horrible rocks and before one particular game I had to tell my team that I could not match the stones since there wasn’t 2 rocks the same. I told the players to manage the best they could with that situation. Beleive it or not, these curlers were making their draws with a lot of precision. At the fifth end meeting, I asked them how they could manage to make their draws with these rocks and they said : « Using the interval timing the lead tells us the speed of each rock ». Indeed, we know that when one ear the sound of the countdown stopwatch right at the hog line, the speed of the draw is 26,5 seconds (from back line to stop) and with a little experience one knows the speed of the ice according to where the sound is listened. We also know that 10 feet for a draw equal one second for the draw weight. During that game at the Grindelwald World Junior Championship, the sweepers could tell to each player on the team the speed of each rock. For example, if the sound of the stopwatch is eqivalent to a 27 seconds draw and that stone stop one foot in front of the house, we know that this draw is half second light. Therefore the draw weight for that rock is 26.5 seconds. The same method may be applied when using a regular stopwatch by timing the time for the rock to travel from the back line to the first hog line. After a while one knows the speed of the ice (or the rock) according to the time obtained. More and more highly competitive teams use this interval timing method. Most of them utilize a regular stopwatch. My personnal preference goes for the countdown stopwatch since only one touch at the start is needed and there is no stop. The margin of error is reduce in comparison with a regular stopwatch which needs a second touch to stop the timer at the hog line. Moreover, the sweepers have to read the time after stopping the watch which is not the case with the countdown system. If you haven’t tried this method of timing yet ? You should go for it. It is easy to get use to it.
Timing the Take Outs in Curling : Why Not?In the previous Sweep Mag Issue, I wrote an article on timing for draws. In this article, I am writing on timing for take outs. Timing the take outs allows the team to standardise the weights and
makes every member of the team throw the same weights. That’s easy to do :
during an on ice practice, time the take outs from a line to an other ; it
could be from the back line to the 2nd T line for example. Once we have
found the lenght of time for our nice take out weight for our team, we
plan the number of different weights we want to use during games and we
establish the time for these weights. A heavy weight at 12 or 13 sec. may be difficult to throw for some members of the team. One should train to progressively improve the weight up to the target one and temporarily throw weights which the curler is comfortable with during games. Allow me to remind you that it is very important to be comfortable with the weight a curler is throwing and never over do it. It is by training that gradually one becomes comfortable with big weights. Timing methods used for take outs are the sameones proposed in the previous Sweep Mag Issue on Timing the Draws :
For a description of these Timing Methods, see the article on the previous Sweep Mag Issue. However, with method 1 and 2 it may be difficult to find the time for a take out when hitting a stone in front of the house since we stop the timer at the T line. That’s why many teams choose method 4 (from the back line to the 2nd hog line). Using that method 4 a normal weight should approximately be 12 sec., a heavy weight about 9 to 11 sec. and a light weight 14 to 15 sec. As suggested in the previous Sweep Mag Issue, a team should combine method 5 (from the back line to the 1st hog line) with the method they are using. During on ice training, the team practices the chosen take out weights and we stop the stopwatch at the first hog line using the « LAP » button and we set back the stopwatch by pressing the « LAP » button again to finallystop the timer at the chosen line acording to the method used. Doing so, we establish the corresponding time for our take out weights at the first hog line. This interval timing of the take outs aloow the sweepers to communicate the weight to the skip improving the communication process within the team. For example : if our normal take out weight usually is 2.80 sec., the brushers will know that the weight is heavier than expected if the time is smaller than 2.80 sec. and lighter if the time is bigger. Once again, each method of timing is good. Chose one, combine it with method 5 and improve the team cohesion and steadyness.
Mental preparation : Stress Control or ManagementThis article is the fourth one of a series on mental preparation. Allow me a brief come back on the introduction of the last articles. My goal is to write an approach allowing the coach to improve some aspects of the mental preparation. Here are a series of techniques that are part of the mental preparation:
The first article of this series focused on mental rehearsal , the second on IMAGERY, the third on Visualization and mental toughness and this one on STRESS CONTROL OR MANAGEMENT. Need for Stress :Please, don’t start with the point of view that stress is always negative. Stress is essential for high performance. The curler who isn’t enough stressed has a tendency for lack of concentration, of intensity; this curler is absent-minded and anything that goes on affect him. Stress helps curlers to concentrate and play with intensity. But if the stress becomes to high, the curler start missing control, emotion comes in, concentration becomes disrupted and even neuro-muscular coordination is affected. Level of Stress:Stress is necessary provided the level is right for a high performance. The ideal level of stress is different from one individual to another. It would be an error to prepare all the team members the same way. The only way to be effective is to do so that each athlete knows the level of stress that allows him a high performance. You face problems on important games if you have an athlete who performs well when the level of stress is low. In those situations, Stress becomes too high and this athlete cannot concentrate at his best. This curler has to find the level of stress within which he/she performs well and must establish strategies to put oneself into this level before the game. Of course, any athlete has to establish strategies to stay within the right level of stress during the game. We all know that at the end of games, the level of stress has a tendency to increase. We all have seen high level athletes experience difficulties at the end of important games. On the contrary, if you have an athlete who performs well when the stress level is very high, you have to manage in such a way that he knows it and that he/she establishes strategies to place himself within this level of stress before the game and find ways to stay in that level during the entire game. When playing a non important game or when playing a “week” team during a Championship, athletes that perform well when the stress level is low will generally play a good game. But athletes that perform well when the stress level his high will generally have a poor game since the stress level is too low for them. Hey coach: you are privileged if your athletes are high stress performer. On important games, it is easier to find the right level of stress since your athletes naturally control that level of stress. We generally have one or two athletes that perform well when the stress level is low. These athletes can perform at a high level as long as they maintain their stress within the right level. We generally see low stress performer in the front as Lead or Second since the stress is easier to control at those positions. The high stress performers generally play at third and skip positions. What should we do to find the ideal level of stress for each athlete? What strategies could we use to make sure each athlete get within the right level of stress and maintain that level? The form that follows is easy to fill and brings appropriate solutions. After a game, give a copy to each curler on the team and fill the form according to each ones feelings. It is recommended to fill the form all together to speak about solutions and answers. It is strongly recommended for coaches to fill that form; I am sure you can imagine the results on the curlers when the coach don’t control his/her stress. Examples of symptoms:
Mental preparation : ImageryThis article is the second one of a series on mental preparation. Allow me a brief come back on the introduction of the last article. My goal is to write an approach allowing the coach to improve some aspects of the mental preparation. Here are a series of techniques that are part of the mental preparation:
The first article of this series focused on mental rehearsal. In this article, I write on IMAGERY. The goal of imagery is to improve, find back or maintain self confidence. This technique, as for mental rehearsal, sonsists in visualizing images of oneself in action. While mental rehearsal consists in visualising images of oneself at present time, imagery is composed of images of oneself that happened in the past. The curler selects a series of successful throws recently made and visualise these successful throws as often as possible. When imagery consists in seeing throws and moreover the result of the successful throws; mental rehearsal care about execution of throws not on results. Imagery technique is simple: as for mental rehearsal, imagery start by relaxing (take a few deep breaths for example) and visualise the selected throws one after the other, success after success,. Imagery is very effective for a curler who has lost self confidence or who is beginning to doubt about oneself capacities. However, we have to be careful when using this technique. Believe my experience, the higher is the confidence, the bigger is the risk to fall apart when error occur. I therefore suggest to utilise imagery when doubt comes in rather than keep on doing these exercises on a regular basis. Take note that imagery and mental rehearsal apply to every sports as well as in life in general. Find a chart comparing the two mental preparation techniques describe in the two last articles: IMAGERY
MENTAL REHEARSAL
Brushing technique for power brushingWe sometimes nostalgically remember the good old corn broom we used prior to the Eighties. The use of the brushes started to be popular at the beginning of the Eighties. Brushes in Canada were than made with Horse hairs while the Scothish were making and using the hog hair brushes. At the end of the Eighties, a timid effort was made for synthetic fabric brushes with interchangeable heads. Ted Brown, without behing the first to promote the synthetic brush, popularized it with his Brownie Brush. Today we find a wide variety of those synthetic brushes. Following this brief resumé of the onset of the brush in Curling in Canada, allow me to write about the technique for the optimal use of that brush. The first technique taught was nice but questionable. Many will remember that method that consisted on placing both hands on the lower part of the brush handle and the upper part of the handle was laying on the thigh of the sliding foot. This technique was easy to learn and was economic on the energy system. The very low body position of that technique was causing weight reading problems to the brushers. While we were teaching that first method, high level competitors moved to a much higher position improving the weight reading. Many different methods made their apperances : different grip positions, body positions, with or without slider. Actually, what we expect from the brushers is to warm up the ice temperature ; because we know that lesser cold is the ice the faster it is. (Allow me to digress for a moment ; a not enough cold ice will be faster, but the pebbles will be too soft and it will flatten out rapidly making the center ice slower as the game progress). To warm up the ice, the brushers have to develop most friction on the ice surface. This friction is the result of the pressure applied on the brush head combined with the speed of the brushing movement. In other words, the friction relies on weight and speed applied on the brush head. (We also could discuss of the amplitude of the brushing movement). Finally, we look for maximum weith and speed of the brush head.. I don’t want to start a discussion about the speed of the movement; each one doing their way according to their own speed capacity. It is possible to improove the speed of the brushing movement specially by improving the power of the anaerobic alactif energy system, but this could be the subject of a next issue article. The weight develop on the brush head is the topic I want to bring your attention on. The majority of the curlers develops wieght on the brush head by mostly using their muscle strenght and a little of the body weight as follow : We find all kinds of technique : with or without slider, brush handle in front (right side on the drawing) or behind (left side on the drawing) of the body ; feet close or far from the trajectory of the stone… Whatever the technique used, our concern for this article is the weight developed on the brush head for most efficiency and the curler faces two alternatives to achieve that : Use of the muscle strenght or Transfer the body weight on the brush head The first method :eventhough the majority of the curlers and even the high competitive
curlers use it, this method does not provide the weight of the second
method and costs much more energy wise. The second methoddevelops more weight on the brush head and demands less energy expense. The proposed technique (second method) consists in bringing the shoulder as much as possible over the brush head. In this position, the brush handle is almost vertical. Applying this technique, you will probably find that your brush is not made to suit this method ; your brush head will probably not be flat on the ice surface. Indeed, as a coach, I had to modify the existing brushes to suit this proposed technique. That the reason why I have develop the fully articulated Performance brush allowing a vertical position of the brush handle and consequantly allowing more body weight transfer to the head of the brush. It is easy to verify this theory : Put your brush head on a bathroom scales, take your usual brushing position and look on the scale the weight you develop. Repeat the same exercise bringing your shoulders over the brush head without straining with your arms ; only grip firmly the brush handle with your hands. Look the result on the scale. If you used a curved or crooked handle, you won’t have to grip firmly the handle since you only have to lay on it. Doing this last exercise, you will find that this theory is right.
A New Look At The No-Backswing Delivery
Release : Biggest challenge in Curling The Problem :
Techniques on release have been developed to face that difficulty. All the techniques start with a good grip and rock positioning: 10 O'clock for an "in turn" for a right hander etc… The thrower maintains the grip and the rock position both during the swing and the slide. He than apply the rotation to the stone on the last three feet (one meter) of the throw bringing the stone handle at noon. If the turn is applied during three feet with a good grip and a good rock position, the rock will do 2 ½ to 3 rotations on a draw. If the stone makes more than 2 rotations, we consider the release as being positive. A positive release allows the stone to travel straighter at the beginning of its slide to start curling later on facilitating throws control. My PROPOSAL:Here is my approach for a better release: As traditionally: Start with a good grip, high wrist Good rock positioning: 10 O'clock or 2 O'clock Maintain the grip and rock positioning during the swing and the slide. And, when you are ready to make the release, rather than applying rotation while releasing the stone, TURN FIRMLY THE HANDLE UP TO NOON WHILE MAINTAINING THE GRIP ON THE HANDLE AND WHEN THE ROTATION IS COMPLETED (handle at noon) open the hand to release the rock at the target. (To know if the rotation is applied firmly enough, count the number of rotations on draws. You should get 2 ½ to 3 rotations). My proposal consists in a two step release. First, apply the rotation and second release the stone. You think to turn the handle and only after you release the stone aiming at the target. During the second step of the release, no question of applying turns to the stone; the stone is already rotating. You simply have to focus on releasing at the broom. The release is than completed by a translation movement which cope with the translation movement of the stone in curling.
Drift
While using the traditionnal technique which is the lift of the rock on the backswing, the drift is often found on beginners, but almost unexistant for the competitors. With the advent of the No Lift Delivery technique, this drift fault is more and more frequently found even at competitive level. What causes the drift? During the forward swing, the stone is pushed toward the target (skip brush) and the sliding foot, for a right hander, is moved forward from left toward the center of the body consequently to the right. If this left to right forward movement (always for a right hander) is not contor balanced during the forward swing, we will find a drift of the slide delivery toward the right side of the target. Generaly, this drift is more palpable on big weights since the forward movement is done faster. Correcting the drift, one can not eliminate the the left to right movement of the sliding foot; at the most one may reduce the sideward movement by placing the sliding foot closer to the line of throw during the backsing. In spite of that, the correction of the drift is very easy : one must correct the TIMING of the forward swing which is :the forward movement of the stone must come before the forward movement of the sliding foot. When the stone is pushed toward the target and the sliding foot comes afterward in the sliding position during the trust of the hack leg, the slide delivery is straight and there is no drift. On the other hand, there is a drift when the forward movement is simultaniously done by the stone and the sliding foot. If you know someone who drift durlig his/her slide delivery, check his/her forward swing and you will find that the stone and the sliding foot simultaniously come forward. Ask him/her to first put forward the stone and secondly the sliding foot ; the drift will disappear. In order to control the timing of the forward swing, I strongly recommend to start with the same timing on the pullback swing whish is : first, pull back the stone and than the sliding foot. A better timing of the pull back favors the correct timing of the forward swing. One question comes : Why don't we find drift on competitors using the traditionnal backswing? When lifting the stone during the backswing, the stone automatically comes back forward first and the proper timing is respected. With the No Lift Delivery, the stone being always in front of the curler, it is easy to forget the correct timing and to simultaniously move forward the stone and the sliding foot. Using the No Lift, one has simply to think of TIMING. André Ferland Four major faults observed during the no backswing delivery
1. Rock not positioned on the target line at the starting positionFirst, let's describe the target line : the target line starts at the skip's brush (target) and ends at the center of the hack. It is extremely important to position the center of the stone on the target line at the stance position. It is common to omit this both the no backswing and the conventional deliveries, the difference being that the target line (axis) in the conventional delivery starts at the skip's brush and goes through the middle of the two hacks, along the center line. Note : Correction :
|